Commercial Excellence Consortium

THE OPERATORS LAB™

Is your organization transforming fast enough to hit your strategic plan?

If your honest answer is no, the Operators Lab™ was built for you.

A free, private 1:1 diagnostic with operators who've done it inside a billion-dollar business.

The risk

If you're leading Commercial Excellence, Strategy, or Transformation in a 1B+ business, you're expected to produce CFO-validated impact.

Fast.

Not activity. Real numbers.

Most programs give you enough to look busy — not enough to move the numbers.

Managers nod along and nothing actually changes.

Workshops land well and fade fast.

By Monday, the ‘new way’ reverts to old habits.

Passive resistance is slowing you down.

The real risk

It's not failure.

It's something worse.

Twelve to twenty-four months of disciplined execution — and no outcome the CFO will claim.

When the Board asks what changed, no one else will answer for you.

By the time it shows, it's too late.

The reality on the ground

You've seen the pattern. You know what it looks like.

Passive resistance

Your team nods along in the workshop. Goes back to the old way on Monday.

Lack of intrinsic motivation

Extrinsic incentives hit a ceiling. People comply but never commit.

Change fatigue

Your commercial leaders have lived through three transformations in five years. They’re tired.

Cynicism from past failures

The last firm came, delivered decks, left. Nothing stuck. Your team remembers.

Behavior doesn’t shift

Training completion hits 95%. Behavior is unchanged.

Momentum stalls out

Initiatives launch hot, go quiet, become “the program nobody asks about anymore.”

Every one of these is the system doing what it was designed to do: remain stable and resist change.

The missing link

Why transformations stall — and what accelerates them.

Strategy tells you where the business needs to be. If you were already there, it would not be a strategy. And closing that gap is not a planning problem — plans, systems, and information do not produce results. People do.

There is also a difference between improvement and transformation. Improvement is doing what you already do, better. Transformation is thousands of people fundamentally changing how they think and act. Knowing what to do is the easy part. Doing it consistently, under adversity, at scale — that is the part that breaks.

The math explains the feeling that things are not moving fast enough. McKinsey Health Institute surveyed 30,000 employees across 30 countries: only 23% rate themselves high on both resilience and adaptability. You are asking people to transform while three out of four tell you, before you start, that they are not built for change. And only 16% of employers invest in building that capacity at all.

The same research shows what happens when the capacity exists. Employees high on both dimensions are 3.8x more likely to demonstrate high innovative behavior. When real organizational support and psychological safety are added, engagement runs 6.0x higher and innovation 6.2x higher than peers.

That capacity has a name and a measure: adaptive capacity — Adversity Quotient (AQ®) and GRIT™, four decades of peer-reviewed science on how people interpret and respond to adversity. It is measurable. It improves with awareness and coaching. And it is the first thing the Lab measures.

23%

of 30,000 employees rate themselves high on both resilience and adaptability. The rest are being asked to transform anyway.

6.2x

higher innovation — and 6.0x higher engagement — when organizational support, psychological safety, resilience, and adaptability converge.

16%

of employers invest in adaptability programs at all. The capacity that decides the race is the one almost nobody builds.

Source: McKinsey Health Institute survey of 30,000 employees across 30 countries; McKinsey Quarterly, December 2024.

Your transformation can only move as fast as your people adapt. That rate can be measured — and raised.

What breakthrough leaders do

The leaders who break through don't run better programs.

They build something entirely different that the CEO can't ignore.

A way of working that produces results the CFO validates, the Board backs, and the organization keeps running long-term — without external support.

The engagement

The Operators Lab™ is a free, private, 1:1 diagnostic — with the operators who've done it.

Not consulting/Not training/Not a sales call

You walk out with a diagnosis of what's slowing your growth and a plan to fix it. Yours to keep — whether or not you ever hire us.

The proof case

Roy van Griensven, Operator-Coach-In-Residence
The operator who built this
Roy van Griensven

Operator-Coach-In-Residence

Roy ran the Commercial Excellence portfolio at a €7B global specialty chemicals company that produced this proof case. Promoted to Head of Business Transformation on the back of it. Today he's in the room with Operators Lab™ members — sharing the playbook directly, operator to operator, and coaching the build personally.

You don't pick up his architecture from a deck. You learn it from him.

Verify Roy on LinkedIn

Grounded in AQ® + GRIT™ — four decades of peer-reviewed behavioral science from Dr. Paul Stoltz. Read the science →

Roy walked into a new role as Head of Commercial Excellence at a €7B specialty chemicals company that was struggling financially with very difficult market conditions.

He inherited a fully built Commercial Excellence upskilling program from a top-tier strategy consulting firm. Academically correct, logical, and beautifully designed.

He scrapped it within two months of getting hired.

Risky move, but it paid off huge.

Roy rebuilt the Commercial Excellence Academy at the center of his portfolio around three things:

  • Intrinsic motivation to eliminate passive resistance
  • Real commercial challenges and opportunities
  • 90-day “Growth Projects” with on-the-job coaching from experienced industry veterans, not consultants.

Mid-eight-figure EBITDA impact. Validated by the CFO.

Within 18 months

Mid-8-figure
EBITDA impact
18 mo
to results
CFO
validated

He was promoted. His mandate expanded.

The figure spans his full Commercial Excellence portfolio — the Academy at the center — and became the internal standard for how change is done.

This works in highly complex, matrixed organizations where alignment is slow, politics are real, and incentives are misaligned.

The Operating System

TransformationOS™

Mindset first. Skillset second. Toolset only when the field demands it.

Tool-Set
Playbooks & Templates
Skill-Set
Growth Projects + On-the-Job Coaching
Mind-Set · The foundation
Intrinsic Motivation · Adaptability · Resilience · Grit
Harness adversity as a fuel source with AQ®

Most programs start at the top and wonder why nothing sticks. We build from the base.

The frame

Why this isn't consulting — and how to tell.

Every buyer at a $1B+ enterprise has consultant fatigue. The firm arrives, delivers decks, runs workshops, leaves. Twelve months later, nothing has stuck. You've seen it. Your team remembers it. So when we say “we're not consultants,” the fair response is: what else are you? Here are the four structural differences that decide it.

01

Operators, not advisors.

The €7B proof case was run by the operator who will sit across from you — not a consultant advising from outside. Everyone you meet has either held your seat inside a billion-dollar enterprise or funded someone who has. We don't advise from frameworks — we've run the operations the frameworks are built to describe, and carried the accountability you carry now.

02

System installation, not deliverables.

Consultants deliver decks and leave. We install a behavioral operating system your team runs — TransformationOS™ — and coach your internal coaches so capability stays with you. There is no slide deck at the end. There is a system that keeps producing after we walk out.

03

You own the capability after.

The diagnosis and the plan are yours after the Lab, whether you continue or not. If you go on to build the program, the coach-the-coach model certifies your internal people and you keep the Growth Platform — 650+ frameworks. Either way, you are not back where you started. You are further ahead, with an asset you own.

04

We succeed when you don't need us.

Consulting economics depend on you needing the firm longer. Ours depend on you leaving with a diagnosis, a plan, and capability inside your team. Here is the unfair part: you keep all of it even if you never hire us. No consulting engagement gives you that for free. It only works because we are confident in where it leads.

The test isn't what we call ourselves. The test is who owns the capability when the engagement ends.

How it works

Five stages. All free. On your timeline.

A few months, or a fast track in weeks. Every stage is worth your time on its own — you walk out of each one holding something you can use, whether or not you ever take a next step. Your executive sponsor only enters at Stage 4, once you already hold a plan.

1

Stage 1 · Align

See the real problem — and the science behind it.

You complete your AQ® and GRIT™ profiles, get a personalized video debrief, then sit down with Dr. Paul Stoltz — creator of the AQ® measure and master coach to the US Olympic team — for a short, direct session. Ask the architect of the science anything.

You walk away seeing your challenge differently: not “my people resist change,” but a design flaw you can measure and fix.

You keep

Your Adaptive Capacity profile (AQ® + GRIT™), Paul’s debrief, the “How to Get Change to Actually Stick” thesis, Paul’s book, and the explainer library — yours to share with anyone you bring along.

2

Stage 2 · Diagnose

A rigorous diagnosis — in your own words.

You give yourself a candid red, yellow, green read against the challenges standing between you and your mandate, then use our Capabilities Framework to pick the three commercial capabilities that matter most. A private working session pressure-tests the diagnosis until it holds.

You keep

A Diagnosis Brief, two to three pages: your challenges, capability gaps, what you have already tried, the impact, and your needs. The kind of rigor you would normally pay a consulting firm for — except it is yours.

3

Stage 3 · Design

Design your own version — modeled on one that worked.

First, the Peer Operator Briefing: Roy walks you through exactly what he did and the principles behind it, operator to operator. “Here is what worked. You do not have to copy it.”

Then a Design Session, where you and the person you will pick to lead the program co-author your own version from the start.

You keep

A Solution Concept — a program design tailored to you, mapped to a two-to-three-year vision with a pilot. Built on the same narrative Roy used to win internal buy-in.

4

Stage 4 · Build the case

Arm your champion. Engage your sponsor.

Your Solution Concept becomes an Executive Alignment Deck, and we coach your delivery. The ask you take upstairs is not budget — it is a 45-minute briefing.

Then a board-level peer who funded this at their own company speaks to your executive sponsor, peer to peer, and de-risks the hardest conversation of the journey.

You keep

Your Executive Alignment Deck, an executive sponsor who is engaged and peer-validated, and a meeting with that board-level reference.

5

Stage 5 · Decide

The whole picture. Your call.

We build the business case with you: the two-to-three-year vision, landed as one 90-day pilot in your toughest region — if it works there, it works anywhere. Your executive team also gets a direct Q&A with the operator who ran the proof case: the good, the bad, and the ugly of two years doing this.

Then the decision is yours, with three honest options on the table: take the plan and run it in-house, build and run the program yourself with our DIY resources and IP, or have us deliver it for you with a customized program built around your business. No pressure, no clock.

You keep

The full, board-ready business case and the peer-operator briefing sessions. Whichever option you choose — in-house, DIY, or with us — everything above is yours.

Measurement

How we measure impact — proactively.

Enterprise EBITDA is the product of thousands of variables no single program controls. Attributing a single number to a single program is a fallacy — and CFOs know it. So we build the proof case on pieces a CFO can validate, not on a cause-and-effect claim. Three lines of evidence, tracked from day one.

The easy lever

Pricing discipline

Realization rate, discount frequency, and proposals closing without concessions. Directly measurable each month. The Academy's fastest quantitative footprint.

The behavioral proof

AQ® + GRIT™ shift

Pre- and post-cohort assessments show measurable movement in adversity response and tenacity. Coach observations confirm behavior change in live Growth Projects.

The compounding indicator

Qualified pipeline + new logos

New qualified opportunities, deal velocity in target accounts, and cross-BU wins — specifically where cohort participants work. Leading indicators the CFO tracks with existing systems.

Yours to keep

What You Walk Away With

Every stage leaves you with something tangible. Six things you keep — whether or not you ever hire us.

1

Roy’s Case Study

The full proof of how a peer drove a mid-eight-figure, CFO-validated result while his company was cutting costs and headcount. Yours immediately, to study and share.

  • €7B specialty chemicals
  • Mid-eight-figure, CFO-validated
  • ~80% less than the consulting plan
2

Your Adaptive Capacity profile

Your AQ® and GRIT™ scores, a personalized video debrief, and a live session with Dr. Paul Stoltz — creator of AQ® and master coach to the US Olympic team.

  • AQ® + GRIT™ profile
  • Debrief with Dr. Paul Stoltz
  • His book + the explainer library
3

Your Diagnosis Brief

Two to three pages — your challenges, capability gaps, what you have tried, and your needs, in your own words. The rigor of a consulting diagnosis, except it is yours.

  • Your challenges, named
  • The three capabilities that matter most
  • Reframed through the science
4

Your Solution Concept

A program design tailored to you, co-authored with Roy and mapped to a two-to-three-year vision with a pilot. The same narrative he used to win internal buy-in.

  • Co-authored with Roy
  • Two-to-three-year vision + a pilot
  • Carries your name, not ours
5

Your Executive Alignment Deck

A board-ready deck — plus a peer-to-peer reference call with the executive who funded this at a €7B company.

  • Board-ready
  • A peer reference call
  • An engaged executive sponsor
6

Your Board-Ready Business Case

The whole picture with three honest options, openly priced — grounded in your own diagnosis, not a pitch.

  • Run the plan in-house
  • DIY with our resources and IP
  • A customized program, delivered with us

Who this is for

Built for operators accountable for growth.

If you're leading Commercial Excellence, Strategy, or Transformation in a 1B+ business, you're expected to produce CFO-validated impact.

Typically, you're in one of two situations.

Situation 1 · New to the role

You've inherited a plan that looks solid on paper. You aren't convinced.

Your commercial leaders are change-fatigued. You can hear them thinking:

“Here we go again. Another one of these.”

And you are on the clock to prove this round is different.

Situation 2 · Tenured in role

You've launched initiatives. Activity is happening. Feedback is solid.

But you don't have a proof case. Nothing you can point to and say:

“Our CFO validated the impact we made.”

And you are feeling the pressure to drive visible growth.

Either way, the diagnosis is the same: you're accountable for commercial impact, but the system you inherited wasn't designed to produce it. The Operators Lab™ doesn't add another program — it replaces the ones that aren't producing results.

If that's not the situation you're in, the Operators Lab™ isn't built for you. We'd rather be clear than polite.

No catch

No fee. No deadline. You keep everything.

The Lab is a mutual evaluation, so the terms are honest up front.

  • No fee, and no deadline to decide. You are never on a clock.
  • Your time is the real cost. A handful of executive hours from you, senior hours from us. We protect both and waste neither.
  • You name one executive sponsor — not involved until much later, and only once you already hold a defensible plan. Your political capital stays protected.

You walk in to evaluate us as much as we are evaluating fit — and you keep everything you build, whatever you decide.

Availability

Limited Availability

We are a small team and take on very few Lab members at a time.

Each client works directly with our senior Operator-Coaches, including Roy van Griensven — our Operator-Coach-In-Residence who built the proof case at a €7B specialty chemicals company.

That means we only open seats when there's capacity to stay hands-on through your diagnosis and design.

If the current intake is full, the next start date moves out, sometimes several months.

Current intake

A few seats a quarter — by invitation or application

Apply to the Operators Lab™

Go deeper

Two recordings that will change how you think about transformation.

Roy van Griensven walks through exactly how he eliminated passive resistance at a €7B specialty chemicals company — and what his CFO needed to sign off on the numbers. Then an expert panel, including Dr. Paul Stoltz, creator of the AQ® measure and master coach to the US Olympic team, unpacks the behavioral science that makes it repeatable. Watch both before you apply and you'll know, with evidence, whether this fits.

Common questions

What leaders ask before they apply

What does the Operators Lab cost, and what is the catch?

+

It is free, and there is no catch. The Lab is a private, 1:1 diagnostic — five stages, on your timeline. You keep everything you build at each one: your Adaptive Capacity profile, a written diagnosis, a program design, an executive deck, and a board-ready business case — whether or not you ever hire us. Your time is the only cost: a handful of executive hours from you, senior hours from us. We can do this because we would rather build the proof case with the right few leaders than sell a program to everyone.

How is this different from what McKinsey, BCG, or Bain would deliver?

+

Three structural differences. First, the people — the €7B proof case was run by the operator who sits across from you, not an advisor, and everyone you meet has either held your seat at a billion-dollar enterprise or funded someone who has. Career consultants and junior staff never touch your work. Second, the model — MBB delivers programs, workshops, decks, and leaves. We help you design a behavioral system your own team runs, so the capability stays with you. Third, the economics — MBB transformation engagements start at seven figures and keep consultants on site for months. The Lab is free, and the program you design afterward runs at a fraction of consulting cost with your team owning the result. The transformation failure rates — McKinsey 70%, BCG 75%, Bain 88% — are not about talent; they are about a model that cannot shift behavior because the people running it have never had to live with the results.

But isn't this consulting, even if you don't call it that?

+

Fair question. The defining test: who owns the capability after the engagement ends? In consulting, the firm owns the IP and the expertise — when they leave, your team is back where they started. In the Operators Lab™, your team owns everything. The diagnosis and the plan are yours after the Lab whether you continue or not. If you go on to build the program, the coach-the-coach model certifies your internal people to run it, and you keep the Demand Metric Growth Platform — 650+ frameworks. The business model is the inverse of consulting: we succeed when you do not need us anymore.

Is Roy van Griensven personally involved?

+

Yes. Roy is our Operator-Coach-in-Residence. He runs the Peer Operator Briefing in the Design stage — walking you through exactly what he built, operator to operator — and returns in the final stage for a direct Q&A with your executive team: the good, the bad, and the ugly of doing this over two years. Across the rest of the Lab the load is carried by our trained Operator-Coaches working under his design, and he is available to participants through our group coaching clinic.

We already have consultants on a transformation program. Is this additive or a replacement?

+

Usually a replacement for the capability building layer, but not the strategy advisory. Consultants are good at strategy, org design, and decks. They are poor at producing behavior change on the ground — their billing model depends on frameworks and workshops, not on frontline habit formation. The Operators Lab™ sits where your consulting spend has been most disappointing: the gap between the plan and what people actually do on Monday morning.

Does this work outside Europe and North America?

+

Yes. The proof case was delivered across three continents with commercial leaders coming from more than a dozen countries. The method is mindset and behavior-first, which transfers across cultures — we are not importing an "American" sales playbook, in fact our Founder is a Canadian living in Colombia. Operator-Coaches are matched to language and region where it matters. Roy leads in English, German, and Dutch and has extensive experience at senior levels in large Japanese enterprises, and working in the Americas, EMEA and APAC.

What is the minimum commitment to see a real result?

+

The Lab itself is free and runs on your timeline — a few months, or a fast track in weeks. The real commitment only comes later, if you decide to build the program you designed. In key-account B2B, where sales cycles are long, a CFO-validated proof case takes time to compound. Roy's €7B specialty chemicals company reached mid-eight-figure EBITDA impact across his full portfolio in under 18 months — the Academy was the centerpiece, not the whole story. Anyone promising that speed and those kinds of results on a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, from a single program or cause, is selling you snake oil.

How is this different from the change-management work our L&D or transformation office already does?

+

Most internal change-management or PMO functions are resourced to run programs — workshops, toolkits, communications plans. They are not resourced to coach individual operators or teams through mindset and behavior change on live commercial problems while the plane is flying. That is what the Operators Lab™ does. We work shoulder-to-shoulder with you and your commercial teams on real Growth Projects until new behaviors stick, then we leave. It is a capability injection, not a program. Additionally, our approach is based on decades of behavioral science across multiple disciplines, not a 'methodology' such as ADKAR or similar.

Still have a question we didn't answer?

Apply and we'll answer it directly in your first conversation — a candid, no-cost read with the operators who've done it.

Apply to the Operators Lab™

Ready to start

A free, private read on your single biggest constraint.

Two ways in: by invitation, or apply below — we review within 48 hours. The first conversation is a candid outside read with operators who've done it. No cost, no pitch. You keep what we build, whatever you decide.

P.S. Once you apply, we'll send you the full specialty chemicals case study — the real breakdown of how the system was built and why it worked. So you can see exactly what you're about to build before you start.